Critical workflows AI-operated
Companion view
Model your AI future.
Pick a date and a few big dials. See how the AI and data landscape could land — the layers, the numbers, the winners, and the white space for whoever builds next.
Below is one projected future. Move a dial, pick a scenario, or open Advanced for the full set of levers — every change re-projects the landscape from today’s market reference architecture, and you can generate a fresh briefing for any scenario you build.
Baseline as of 2026-05 · Updated 2026-05-28
AI Prediction Report
Updated weekly · 2026-06-07The State of AI & Data — May 2028
The base-case projection, generated by the AI Futures Studio and refreshed each week as the market data updates. Move a lever to model a different future.
79.3 → 91.6
Market index
editorial index, 0-100
7% → 24%
Workflows AI-operated
100 → 66
Cost per governed action
index, 100 = today
70
Top opportunity · L6 Agents
white-space score
The Headline
Welcome to May 2028. Under this scenario the enterprise AI market index moves 79.3 to 91.6, and the center of gravity shifts toward layer 6 — agent tools. Scenario shaped by Model capability high, Cost decline high, SaaS disruption high.
What Happened to SaaS
The application layer reads strengthening (78.3 → 88.3). SaaS seat pricing renegotiated runs 6% → 22%; the question is no longer whether agents touch the workflow, but who prices the work once they do.
The Data and Context Layer
The governed-context layer reads strengthening (86 → 94.3). Enterprise data that is agent-ready moves 19% → 35%. Trusted context is what lets agents move from advice to execution.
Models, Labor, and the Open-Weight Balance
The model layer reads strengthening (87.6 → 95.7). Enterprise inference on open weights moves 23% → 32%, which sets the bargaining table for every frontier contract.
The Economics of Intelligence
Cost per governed action moves 100 → 66 (index, 100 = today). That single number is the one CFOs will quote. It reframes every model-routing decision as a financial control, not a technical preference.
Workforce and the Org Chart
Agents per human in instrumented teams moves 0.3x → 1.6x, and critical workflows that are AI-operated move 7% → 24%. The org chart is incomplete without the authority map underneath it.
Governance, Security, and Authority
Governance is the gate between insight and action. With the regulatory regime set to moderate, the durable advantage goes to the operators who can reconstruct an agent's decision path on demand.
Winners and Losers
The clearest gainer is Zeroclaw in agent tools (66 → 96). The clearest pressure lands on Microsoft in commercial tools (92 → 95). The mechanism in both cases is the same: where the work moves, the margin follows.
Opportunity Spaces and New Entrants
The clearest white space sits where growth, headroom, and fragmentation overlap — layers no incumbent has locked.
- Layer 6 — Agent Tools (opportunity 70.2/100). The frontier: cross-system agent control plane and authority graph. Watch for an agent-operations and reliability specialist.
- Layer 4 — AI-Ready Data (opportunity 59/100). The frontier: real-time retrieval plus a policy mesh. Watch for an open, hybrid retrieval-infrastructure entrant.
- Layer 5 — Developer Tools (opportunity 54.8/100). The frontier: spec-to-system agent development platform. Watch for an agent-foreman ide that keeps architecture under human control.
The Laws That Held
- Where work moves, margin follows. Layer 6 — Agent Tools gains as the work concentrates there.
- Context beats model size in bounded workflows.
- Governance must be executable, not a PDF.
- Layer 1 — AI Infrastructure shows the cost of defending the old interface against the new operator.
The Brian Letort Take
Heuristic feature vector derived directly from lever positions. Enable AI synthesis for emergent second-order effects. The operators who win 2028 are not the ones with the most software. They are the ones with the clearest authority, cleanest context, and cheapest safe intelligence. Set the levers, read the numbers, and decide what your enterprise lets agents operate.
This is the base case for May 2028. Move a dial, pick a scenario, or open Advanced to model your own future — then generate a fresh briefing.
May
2028
Horizon
2
Years out
91.6
Market index +12.3
Projected landscape
Where the layer cake lands.
The seven-layer AI stack at your horizon. Each bar is projected strength; the line marks where it sits today.
Headline numbers
The news, as metrics.
Cost per governed action (index, 100 = today)
Agents per human (instrumented teams)
SaaS seat pricing renegotiated
Enterprise inference on open weights
Enterprise data agent-ready
White space
Opportunity spaces and new entrants.
Layers most open to a company that doesn't lead today: fast growth, room to climb, and no entrenched winner.
L6 Agents
Cross-system agent control plane and authority graph
70
opportunity
Who could win: An agent-operations and reliability specialist
Pulled open by agent sprawl that needs identity, permissioning, and observability.
L4 AI Data
Real-time retrieval plus a policy mesh
59
opportunity
Who could win: An open, hybrid retrieval-infrastructure entrant
Pulled open by agents needing fresh, permissioned context at low latency.
L5 Dev Tools
Spec-to-system agent development platform
55
opportunity
Who could win: An agent-foreman IDE that keeps architecture under human control
Pulled open by AI-generated software outpacing review and architecture discipline.
L7 Commercial
Outcome-priced vertical agent
48
opportunity
Who could win: A workflow-deep vertical agent operator
Pulled open by seat-based pricing breaking as agents do the work.
Trajectories
Direction of travel, with uncertainty.
NVIDIA
96 → 99L1 Infrastructure
OpenAI
94 → 98L2 Models
Databricks
88 → 96L3 Data Mgmt
Pinecone
84 → 94L4 AI Data
Cursor
77 → 95L5 Dev Tools
Anthropic
87 → 96L6 Agents
Microsoft
92 → 95L7 Commercial
Movers
Who gains, who gives ground.
Projected gainers
Zeroclaw
agent tools
+30
66 → 96
Hermes
agent tools
+26
70 → 96
Sierra
agent tools
+24.7
69 → 93.7
Vercel
ai ready data
+22.2
71 → 93.2
Harvey
commercial tools
+19.8
72 → 91.8
Cursor
developer tools
+18
77 → 95
Projected decliners
Microsoft
commercial tools
+3
92 → 95
NVIDIA
ai infrastructure
+3
96 → 99
OpenAI
model portfolio
+4
94 → 98
Amazon Web Services
ai infrastructure
+4.7
88 → 92.7
Anthropic
model portfolio
+6
92 → 98
Wiz
commercial tools
+6.6
80 → 86.6
How the projection works.
- Levers are the premise. A horizon up to five years out, ten forces, assumption shocks, and constraints. Presets set a coherent starting mix.
- Emergent features feed the model. A heuristic translates levers into features directly; the AI pass adds second-order reasoning — category growth multipliers, shocks, and vendor biases the linear model cannot see.
- A statistical model grounds the numbers. Damped-trend extrapolation over the real position history, force modifiers, probability-weighted shocks, and seeded Monte Carlo for p10/p90 bands. Same levers, same numbers, every time.
- The narrative is downstream. The briefing cites the projected metrics and movers; it never invents numbers that contradict the model.
Set the levers. Project the future. Read the news.
AI-readable exports.
Exports accept the same ?s= scenario parameter as the studio, so any projected future is reproducible and shareable as data.