brianletort.ai
Industry

Companion view

Model your AI future.

Pick a date and a few big dials. See how the AI and data landscape could land — the layers, the numbers, the winners, and the white space for whoever builds next.

Below is one projected future. Move a dial, pick a scenario, or open Advanced for the full set of levers — every change re-projects the landscape from today’s market reference architecture, and you can generate a fresh briefing for any scenario you build.

Baseline as of 2026-05 · Updated 2026-05-28

AI Prediction Report

Updated weekly · 2026-06-07

The State of AI & Data — May 2028

The base-case projection, generated by the AI Futures Studio and refreshed each week as the market data updates. Move a lever to model a different future.

79.3 → 91.6

Market index

editorial index, 0-100

7% → 24%

Workflows AI-operated

100 → 66

Cost per governed action

index, 100 = today

70

Top opportunity · L6 Agents

white-space score

The Headline

Welcome to May 2028. Under this scenario the enterprise AI market index moves 79.3 to 91.6, and the center of gravity shifts toward layer 6 — agent tools. Scenario shaped by Model capability high, Cost decline high, SaaS disruption high.

What Happened to SaaS

The application layer reads strengthening (78.3 → 88.3). SaaS seat pricing renegotiated runs 6% → 22%; the question is no longer whether agents touch the workflow, but who prices the work once they do.

The Data and Context Layer

The governed-context layer reads strengthening (86 → 94.3). Enterprise data that is agent-ready moves 19% → 35%. Trusted context is what lets agents move from advice to execution.

Models, Labor, and the Open-Weight Balance

The model layer reads strengthening (87.6 → 95.7). Enterprise inference on open weights moves 23% → 32%, which sets the bargaining table for every frontier contract.

The Economics of Intelligence

Cost per governed action moves 100 → 66 (index, 100 = today). That single number is the one CFOs will quote. It reframes every model-routing decision as a financial control, not a technical preference.

Workforce and the Org Chart

Agents per human in instrumented teams moves 0.3x → 1.6x, and critical workflows that are AI-operated move 7% → 24%. The org chart is incomplete without the authority map underneath it.

Governance, Security, and Authority

Governance is the gate between insight and action. With the regulatory regime set to moderate, the durable advantage goes to the operators who can reconstruct an agent's decision path on demand.

Winners and Losers

The clearest gainer is Zeroclaw in agent tools (66 → 96). The clearest pressure lands on Microsoft in commercial tools (92 → 95). The mechanism in both cases is the same: where the work moves, the margin follows.

Opportunity Spaces and New Entrants

The clearest white space sits where growth, headroom, and fragmentation overlap — layers no incumbent has locked.

  • Layer 6 — Agent Tools (opportunity 70.2/100). The frontier: cross-system agent control plane and authority graph. Watch for an agent-operations and reliability specialist.
  • Layer 4 — AI-Ready Data (opportunity 59/100). The frontier: real-time retrieval plus a policy mesh. Watch for an open, hybrid retrieval-infrastructure entrant.
  • Layer 5 — Developer Tools (opportunity 54.8/100). The frontier: spec-to-system agent development platform. Watch for an agent-foreman ide that keeps architecture under human control.

The Laws That Held

  • Where work moves, margin follows. Layer 6 — Agent Tools gains as the work concentrates there.
  • Context beats model size in bounded workflows.
  • Governance must be executable, not a PDF.
  • Layer 1 — AI Infrastructure shows the cost of defending the old interface against the new operator.

The Brian Letort Take

Heuristic feature vector derived directly from lever positions. Enable AI synthesis for emergent second-order effects. The operators who win 2028 are not the ones with the most software. They are the ones with the clearest authority, cleanest context, and cheapest safe intelligence. Set the levers, read the numbers, and decide what your enterprise lets agents operate.


This is the base case for May 2028. Move a dial, pick a scenario, or open Advanced to model your own future — then generate a fresh briefing.

May

2028

Horizon

2

Years out

91.6

Market index +12.3

Projected landscape

Where the layer cake lands.

The seven-layer AI stack at your horizon. Each bar is projected strength; the line marks where it sits today.

Now marker · click a layer for all playersProjected for May 2028

Headline numbers

The news, as metrics.

Critical workflows AI-operated

24%from 7%

Cost per governed action (index, 100 = today)

66from 100

Agents per human (instrumented teams)

1.6xfrom 0.3x

SaaS seat pricing renegotiated

22%from 6%

Enterprise inference on open weights

32%from 23%

Enterprise data agent-ready

35%from 19%

White space

Opportunity spaces and new entrants.

Layers most open to a company that doesn't lead today: fast growth, room to climb, and no entrenched winner.

L6 Agents

Cross-system agent control plane and authority graph

70

opportunity

Who could win: An agent-operations and reliability specialist

Pulled open by agent sprawl that needs identity, permissioning, and observability.

Growth100
Headroom0
Open100

L4 AI Data

Real-time retrieval plus a policy mesh

59

opportunity

Who could win: An open, hybrid retrieval-infrastructure entrant

Pulled open by agents needing fresh, permissioned context at low latency.

Growth70
Headroom10
Open100

L5 Dev Tools

Spec-to-system agent development platform

55

opportunity

Who could win: An agent-foreman IDE that keeps architecture under human control

Pulled open by AI-generated software outpacing review and architecture discipline.

Growth60
Headroom0
Open100

L7 Commercial

Outcome-priced vertical agent

48

opportunity

Who could win: A workflow-deep vertical agent operator

Pulled open by seat-based pricing breaking as agents do the work.

Growth50
Headroom10
Open100

Trajectories

Direction of travel, with uncertainty.

NVIDIA logo

NVIDIA

9699

L1 Infrastructure

OpenAI logo

OpenAI

9498

L2 Models

Databricks logo

Databricks

8896

L3 Data Mgmt

Pinecone logo

Pinecone

8494

L4 AI Data

Cursor logo

Cursor

7795

L5 Dev Tools

Anthropic logo

Anthropic

8796

L6 Agents

Microsoft logo

Microsoft

9295

L7 Commercial

Movers

Who gains, who gives ground.

Projected gainers

  • Zeroclaw logo

    Zeroclaw

    agent tools

    +30

    6696

  • Hermes logo

    Hermes

    agent tools

    +26

    7096

  • Sierra logo

    Sierra

    agent tools

    +24.7

    6993.7

  • Vercel logo

    Vercel

    ai ready data

    +22.2

    7193.2

  • Harvey logo

    Harvey

    commercial tools

    +19.8

    7291.8

  • Cursor logo

    Cursor

    developer tools

    +18

    7795

Projected decliners

  • Microsoft logo

    Microsoft

    commercial tools

    +3

    9295

  • NVIDIA logo

    NVIDIA

    ai infrastructure

    +3

    9699

  • OpenAI logo

    OpenAI

    model portfolio

    +4

    9498

  • Amazon Web Services logo

    Amazon Web Services

    ai infrastructure

    +4.7

    8892.7

  • Anthropic logo

    Anthropic

    model portfolio

    +6

    9298

  • Wiz logo

    Wiz

    commercial tools

    +6.6

    8086.6

How the projection works.

  • Levers are the premise. A horizon up to five years out, ten forces, assumption shocks, and constraints. Presets set a coherent starting mix.
  • Emergent features feed the model. A heuristic translates levers into features directly; the AI pass adds second-order reasoning — category growth multipliers, shocks, and vendor biases the linear model cannot see.
  • A statistical model grounds the numbers. Damped-trend extrapolation over the real position history, force modifiers, probability-weighted shocks, and seeded Monte Carlo for p10/p90 bands. Same levers, same numbers, every time.
  • The narrative is downstream. The briefing cites the projected metrics and movers; it never invents numbers that contradict the model.

Set the levers. Project the future. Read the news.

AI-readable exports.

Exports accept the same ?s= scenario parameter as the studio, so any projected future is reproducible and shareable as data.

AI Futures Studio — Industry | Brian Letort