BTOS national current AI use rateno data
— percent
on track < 26 · off >= 30manual ↗
connector returned no usable reading · checked 2026-10-19
Radar · Enterprise absorption · T1 · 2027 · WARNING
The share of US businesses reporting current AI use in the Census Bureau's Business Trends and Outlook Survey stays below 30% in every biweekly collection period through the end of 2027.
Nearly every capex model assumes enterprise adoption broadens fast. The Census series is the only nationally representative, biweekly read on whether firms outside the Information and Finance sectors are actually using AI in operations. If four in five businesses are still not using it at the end of 2027, the demand side of the buildout is narrower than the narrative.
Registered at 55% on September 8, 2026. Engine repriced 14 times; now 45%.
Registered thresholds. Status is computed from the latest public reading.
Would raise my number
Would cut it
6 personas on one model (openai/gpt-5.6-sol); other vendors were unavailable this run, so read this as one model's persona-averaged view.
44%
grid-and-power-planner · openai/gpt-5.6-sol
My reference class is broad-firm adoption of general-purpose business software: diffusion usually continues but decelerates after early enthusiasm. From 21.7%, BTOS must gain 8.3 points in roughly 17 months to falsify the thesis. The recent 4-point six-month gain would cross 30%, while respondents’ 24.5% six-month expectation implies a slower, near-threshold path. Because one biweekly print suffices, sampling variation increases the crossing probability if the underlying rate approaches 30%. Wording changes or discontinuation also resolve asymmetrically against the thesis. The supplied BLS productivity series is weak evidence about measured firm adoption.
39%
semiconductor-supply-chain-analyst · openai/gpt-5.6-sol
My reference class is enterprise-technology diffusion measured by repeated business surveys: adoption usually slows after early uptake, but not enough to make a 21.7% starting point safely remain below 30% for 17 months. Respondents’ six-month expectation implies slower growth to 24.5%, yet only another 5.5 points during 2027 would trigger failure. The recent six-month gain was 4.0 points, and the single-print, biweekly rule makes sampling volatility unfavorable to the thesis. The BLS productivity series is too indirect to outweigh the adoption trajectory. Discontinuation also counts as a miss. These factors put the stay-below case below even odds and below the forecaster’s 0.55.
42%
enterprise-cio · openai/gpt-5.6-sol
My reference class is enterprise technology diffusion after initial experimentation: broad production adoption usually advances more slowly than pilots, but a threshold only 8.3 points above July 2026 is reachable in 17 months. Respondents’ own six-month expectation implies 24.5%, leaving 5.5 points during 2027. Procurement, security, integration, data readiness, and weak measured productivity favor deceleration, especially among small firms. Against that, the series reportedly gained 4 points in six months; even partial continuation could produce one 30.0% print. The resolution rule is demanding: every period must remain below the threshold, while one volatile crossing or series discontinuation causes a miss.
31%
credit-analyst · openai/gpt-5.6-sol
Using enterprise-software S-curve diffusion after roughly 20% penetration as the reference class, I estimate an annualized threshold-breach hazard near 0.75. Compounded over roughly 17 months from the supplied July reading, survival is about 0.34 before adverse resolution adjustments. The 21.7% rate needs an 8.3-point rise, but both the January-July gain and respondents’ six-month plans imply a trajectory near 30% by end-2027. Biweekly observations make one noisy overshoot sufficient. Weak productivity growth is poor contrary evidence because adoption can precede measurable output gains. Wording changes, volatility, and discontinuation all resolve against the thesis.
41%
geopolitics-policy-analyst · openai/gpt-5.6-sol
The relevant reference class is diffusion of broadly useful business technologies in recurring firm surveys: adoption often slows after early adopters, but sustained recent growth makes a fixed threshold vulnerable. From July 2026’s reported 21.7%, the series needs 8.3 points by end-2027; the January–July gain annualizes above that pace, while respondents’ six-month expectation implies some deceleration. Remaining below 30% is plausible if implementation bottlenecks deepen, but the single-reading falsifier, many collection periods, sampling volatility near the threshold, and automatic loss upon discontinuation all reduce survival odds. The productivity indicator is weakly informative.
35%
superforecaster-statistician · openai/gpt-5.6-sol
Base rate: for positively trending business-technology adoption series already above 20%, I use a 0.40 chance of remaining below a threshold 8.3 points higher for another 17 months. The supplied July 2026 level (21.7%) and January–July gain (+4.0 points) imply crossing before the horizon if maintained. Respondents’ six-month expectation is slower (24.5%), supporting deceleration, but leaves only 5.5 points to 30 over roughly 11 months. One noisy biweekly print, wording-driven jump, or discontinuation without a successor causes a miss. The productivity indicator is weakly relevant. No calibration table was supplied. These asymmetries reduce my estimate to 0.35.
52% from drift-bm-terminal:li-2. P(indicator li-2 satisfies onTrack < 2.5 at 2027-12-31); drift +0.534/yr, vol 5.64/sqrt(yr) from 10 points; proxy for the thesis, not its rule